Menu

Ireland's sailing, boating & maritime magazine

Displaying items by tag: RBAI

#Rowing: Portadown Regatta enjoyed almost perfect conditions today. A packed programme was run in bright, warm sunshine and on flat water. RBAI beat the host club in one of the top events of the day, the men’s junior 18 eights final, reversing the decision of last year.

Shauna Murtagh of Carrick-on-Shannon beat Kate Crawford of Portadown in the women’s junior 18 single sculls – a first win in a regatta for the 16-year-old daughter of Ireland great Frances Cryan.

The men’s junior 18 single was won by Hugh Moore of Coleraine Grammar School.

Published in Rowing

#ROWING: The RBAI men’s junior 18A quadruple sculls was the fastest crew at the Lagan Scullers Head of the River in Belfast on Saturday. Competing in the third of three races on the day, RBAI set a time of 11 minutes and .6 of a second for the course of approximately 3,100 metres. A Methodist College junior A quadruple was second in this race and Methody crews also came home first in the other two races.

 

DRAFT RESULTS
LSH - 21st March 2015
Race 1
Pos. No. Name Club Class
Time
mm:ss.s
Class
Pos.
Diff.
(secs) %
Masters
H'cap
Time
1 32 Macrae,Cal MCRC 2xM16 11:51.8 1 100.0%
2 1 McKibbin,M BBC 1xMSen 11:56.1 1 4.3 100.6%
3 10 Mawhinney,A MCRC 4x+M15 12:20.8 1 24.7 104.1%
4 39 Shirley,J Portora 2xM16 12:20.9 2 0.1 104.1%
5 7 Reid,N RBAI 1xM18A 12:27.8 1 6.9 105.1%
6 3 Curran,J BBC 1xMSen 12:27.9 2 0.1 105.1%
7 11 McClean,C Portora 4x+M15 12:31.8 2 3.9 105.6%
8 44 Shirlow,K Bann 2xW18A 12:42.0 1 10.2 107.1%
9 13 Scott,A CAI 4x+M15 12:42.8 3 0.8 107.2%
10 4 Beck,C QUB 1xMSen 12:50.1 3 7.3 108.2%
11 46 Wylie,L Bann 2xW18A 13:00.3 2 10.2 109.6%
12 36 Meenagh,R Bann 2xW18A 13:00.5 3 0.2 109.7%
13 5 Gray,D BBC 2xMMastG 13:09.0 1 8.5 110.8% 11:33.0
14 12 Dolan,S Portora 4x+M15 13:16.5 4 7.5 111.9%
15 31 Baker,C Portora 2xM16 13:16.5 3 0.0 111.9%
16 18 McGivern,T LSC 1xMSen 13:24.9 4 8.4 113.1%
17 40 Mackin,O Portora 2xM16 13:28.8 4 3.9 113.6%
18 9 Jordan,J BRC 1xM18A 13:32.8 2 4.0 114.2%
19 21 Blundell,O BBC 1xWInt 13:35.0 1 2.2 114.5%
20 45 Taylor,L BRC 2xW18A 13:36.4 4 1.4 114.7%
21 30 Simpson,M CAI 2xM16 13:40.5 5 4.1 115.3%
22 20 Deyermond,C MCRC 1xWSen 13:41.5 1 1.0 115.4%
23 6 Cunningham,C BBC 2xMMastF 13:47.3 1 5.8 116.2% 12:33.3
24 33 O'Hara,D LVBC 2xMMastE 13:47.9 1 0.6 116.3% 12:53.9
25 50 Scott,H Bann 1xW16 13:49.5 1 1.6 116.5%
26 14 Millar,J CAI 4x+M15 13:54.1 5 4.6 117.2%
27 38 Murtagh,D P'down 2xM16 13:54.8 6 0.7 117.3%
28 23 McCaughtry,B BRC 4x+WTimeOnly 14:07.4 1 12.6 119.1%
29 43 Leahy,K MCRC 2xW18A 14:07.7 5 0.3 119.1%
30 34 Maginnis,R MCRC 2xW18A 14:08.6 6 0.9 119.2%
31 17 McAllister,J LSC 1xMSen 14:12.1 5 3.5 119.7%
32 27 Hogg,C QUBLBC 4x+WNov 14:38.9 1 26.8 123.5%
33 26 Bell,E BBC 4x+WNov 14:39.6 2 0.7 123.6%
34 15 Kashyap,A MCRC 4x+M14 14:40.7 1 1.1 123.7%
35 24 Cheung,M BRC 4x+WNov 14:45.6 3 4.9 124.4%
36 41 Maguire,R) QUBLBC 1xWC2 14:52.1 1 6.5 125.3%
37 29 Sherlock,D BBC 4xWMastC 14:58.7 1 6.6 126.3% 14:35.7
38 22 Martin,A P'down 1xWInt 15:33.7 2 35.0 131.2%
39 42 Whittaker,J QUBLBC 1xWC2 16:14.9 2 41.2 137.0%
40 48 McCann,K P'down 1xW16 16:27.5 2 12.6 138.7%
41 2 Darby,N LSC 1xMSen NTT
42 8 Earley,T CoShannon 1xM18A NTT
43 16 Woodhouse,M Portora 4x+M14 NTT
44 19 Turner,K BBC 1xWSen NTT
45 25 Lunny,J Portora 4x+WNov NTT
46 28 Humphreys,L BBC 4xWMastD NTT
47 35 Willis,J Portora 2xW18A NTT
48 37 Ryder Moore,O MCRC 2xM16 NTT
49 47 McCabe,C CoShannon 1xW16 NTT
50 49 O'Connor,A CoShannon 1xW16 NTT
51 51 Duggan,T CoShannon 1xW16 NTT
Average: 13:41.4
DRAFT RESULTS
LSH - 21st March 2015
Race 2
Pos. No. Name Club Class
Time
mm:ss.s
Class
Pos.
Diff.
(secs) %
Masters
H'cap
Time
1 68 Gibson,B MCRC 4x+M16 11:25.5 1 100.0%
2 67 Woodhouse,M Portora 4x+M16 11:45.1 2 19.6 102.9%
3 74 Lockwood,S BBC 4xMMastF 12:20.0 1 34.9 108.0% 11:08.0
4 63 Whiteside,B RBAI 2xM18A 12:31.5 1 11.5 109.6%
5 78 Irwin,B Portora 1xMInt 12:38.3 1 6.8 110.6%
6 64 Hulatt,R RBAI 4x+M16 12:46.2 3 7.9 111.8%
7 70 McBrinn,R MCRC 2xWSen 12:57.7 1 11.5 113.5%
8 66 Ramsey,J MCRC 4x+M16 13:10.1 4 12.4 115.3%
9 77 McMullan,M QUB 1xMInt 13:14.4 2 4.3 115.9%
10 85 McClean,C Portora 4x+W16 13:29.0 1 14.6 118.0%
11 65 Scott,A CAI 4x+M16 13:29.5 5 0.5 118.1%
12 69 Mawhinney,A MCRC 4x+M16 13:34.8 6 5.3 118.9%
13 83 Barry,E Bann 1xW18A 13:35.5 1 0.7 119.0%
14 89 Foster,K BRC 1xMC2 13:37.0 1 1.5 119.2%
15 95 Dolan,S Portora 4x+W15 13:37.1 1 0.1 119.2%
16 86 Breen,C Bann 4x+W15 13:43.9 2 6.8 120.2%
17 97 Morrow,D MCRC 4x+WTimeOnly 13:48.7 1 4.8 120.9%
18 84 McCaughtry,B BRC 4x+W16 13:50.3 2 1.6 121.1%
19 62 Menary,S MCRC 2xM18A 13:59.6 2 9.3 122.5%
20 82 Mullan,B Bann 1xW18A 14:01.0 2 1.4 122.7%
21 75 Laivins,A P'down 1xMInt 14:04.5 3 3.5 123.2%
22 104 Wylie,L Bann 1xW18A 14:05.8 3 1.3 123.4%
23 71 Jackson,M BRC 2xWSen 14:07.3 2 1.5 123.6%
24 99 Moore,H CAI 1xM15 14:10.5 1 3.2 124.1%
25 101 Taylor,L BRC 1xW18A 14:17.0 4 6.5 125.0%
26 91 Purdy,U BBC 1xWMastD 14:39.7 1 22.7 128.3% 13:57.7
27 90 Chambers,L P'down 1xMC2 14:41.0 2 1.3 128.5%
28 102 Odonovan,A Bann 1xW18A 14:44.2 5 3.2 129.0%
29 79 Meenagh,R Bann 1xW18A 14:51.3 6 7.1 130.0%
30 92 Lockwood,A BBC 1xWMastF 15:01.3 1 10.0 131.5% 13:39.3
31 73 Brighton,D P'down 4xMMastD 15:22.8 1 21.5 134.6% 14:45.8
32 96 Bell,A Portora 4x+W15 15:45.5 3 22.7 137.9%
33 88 Williamson,R QUB 1xMC2 16:14.1 3 28.6 142.1%
34 87 Balcombe,S Portora 4x+W15 16:32.0 4 17.9 144.7%
35 61 McCann,L QUB 4xMSen NTT
36 72 Douglas,A LS/BRC 4xMMastF NTT
37 76 Doyle,P QUB 1xMInt NTT
38 80 Coulter,C BRC 1xW18A NTT
39 81 Kelly,A CoShannon 1xW18A NTT
40 93 Bell,R BBC 1xWMastE NTT
41 94 Venkatraman,L LSC 1xWMastC NTT
42 98 McDade,J Portora 1xM15 NTT
43 100 Blake,R Portora 1xM15 NTT
44 103 Brogan,E CoShannon 1xW18A NTT
Average: 13:53.3
DRAFT RESULTS
LSH - 21st March 2015
Race 3
Pos. No. Name Club Class
Time
mm:ss.s
Class
Pos.
Diff.
(secs) %
Masters
H'cap
Time
1 112 Gaston,M RBAI 4xM18A 11:00.6 1 100.0%
2 111 Wills,M MCRC 4xM18A 11:02.3 2 1.7 100.3%
3 122 Curran,J BBC 2xMSen 11:12.7 1 10.4 101.8%
4 113 Gibson,B MCRC 4x+M18B 11:21.9 1 9.2 103.2%
5 115 McGarry,C MCRC 4xW18A 11:40.3 1 18.4 106.0%
6 120 McCaughtry,T BRC 2xMSen 11:41.7 2 1.4 106.2%
7 121 Magill,E MCRC 2xMSen 11:45.2 3 3.5 106.8%
8 136 Ramsey,J MCRC 4x+MNov 12:03.6 1 18.4 109.5%
9 133 Bell,E BBC 4x+MNov 12:21.4 2 17.8 112.2%
10 117 White,K BRC 4xW18A 12:37.0 2 15.6 114.6%
11 114 Andress,O MCRC 4xWSen 12:39.4 1 2.4 115.0%
12 119 Hoy,J RBAI 2xMSen 12:42.9 4 3.5 115.5%
13 159 Mills,R Portora 2xM14 12:44.6 1 1.7 115.7%
14 141 Marron,E LVBC 1xMMastC 12:55.8 1 11.2 117.4% 12:33.8
15 137 Honan,M RBAI 4x+MNov 12:56.6 3 0.8 117.6%
16 156 Macrae,C MCRC 1xM16 13:03.3 1 6.7 118.6%
17 138 McGivern,T LSC 1xMMastB 13:11.8 1 8.5 119.9% 13:04.8
18 152 Hetherington,H RBAI 1xM16 13:14.2 2 2.4 120.2%
19 143 D'Urso,G CoD 1xMMastE 13:15.6 1 1.4 120.4% 12:17.6
20 129 McEvoy,C MCRC 2xM15 13:24.3 1 8.7 121.8%
21 170 Steerer MCRC 8x+MTimeOnly 13:31.0 1 6.7 122.8%
22 135 Taylor,M BRC 4x+MNov 13:33.5 4 2.5 123.1%
23 139 McAllister,J LSC 1xMMastC 13:50.5 2 17.0 125.7% 13:28.5
24 153 Ryder Moore,O MCRC 1xM16 13:53.5 3 3.0 126.2%
25 157 O'Hare Smith,S Portora 1xM16 13:56.2 4 2.7 126.6%
26 124 Sherlock,S Portora 2xW16 14:00.5 1 4.3 127.2%
27 145 Lockwood,S BBC 1xMMastF 14:02.5 1 2.0 127.5% 12:43.5
28 140 Cross,P LSC 1xMMastC 14:02.6 3 0.1 127.6% 13:40.6
29 146 Fettis,G LSC 1xMMastG 14:03.9 1 1.3 127.7% 12:22.9
30 130 Farragher,R Portora 2xM15 14:09.9 2 6.0 128.7%
31 123 Moffatt,R Bann 2xW16 14:17.1 2 7.2 129.7%
32 151 Evans,C CAI 1xM16 14:28.0 5 10.9 131.4%
33 149 Griffith,P LSC 1xMMastF 14:31.1 2 3.1 131.9% 13:12.1
34 148 Keown,P LVBC 1xMMastE 14:31.8 2 0.7 132.0% 13:33.8
35 163 Hobson,K BRC 4x+WTimeOnly 14:31.9 1 0.1 132.0%
36 161 McClean,C Portora 4x+WTimeOnly 14:34.0 2 2.1 132.3%
37 142 Boomer,J LVBC 1xMMastC 14:41.0 4 7.0 133.4% 14:19.0
38 128 King,A CAI 2xM15 14:59.8 3 18.8 136.2%
39 132 Southwell,G P'down 4xMixedSen 15:22.5 1 22.7 139.6%
40 134 Bell,A Portora 4x+MNov 15:30.7 5 8.2 140.9%
41 155 Rafferty,L Portora 1xM16 16:09.0 6 38.3 146.7%
42 160 McComb,T Portora 2xW14 17:23.7 1 74.7 158.0%
43 162 Dolan,S Portora 4x+WTimeOnly 18:42.9 3 79.2 170.0%
44 116 Boyd,A P'down 4xW18A NTT
45 118 Scott,H Bann 4xW18A NTT
46 125 Gannon,E CoShannon2xW16 NTT
47 126 Woods,C MCRC 2xW16 NTT
48 127 O'Connor,A CoShannon2xW16 NTT
49 131 Sherlock,D BBC 4xWSen NTT
50 144 Gray,D BBC 1xMMastF NTT
51 147 Coppinger,H BBC 1xMMastG NTT
52 150 Purdy,U BBC 2xWMastE NTT
53 154 Young,X MCRC 1xM16 NTT
54 158 Stewart,C Portora 2xM14 NTT
Average: 13:37.3
Published in Rowing

# ROWING: The Rowing Ireland talent identification programme run by Nathan Adams in Belfast provided the fastest female and male single scullers at the Lagan Scullers’ Head of the River on Saturday. Up-and-coming talents Gareth McKillen and Bridget Jacques topped the rankings. A Belfast Boat Club/RBAI composite coxed quadruple scull was the fastest crew of the day.

Lagan Sculler’s Head of the River, Belfast, Saturday (Selected Results)

Race One: 1 Bann women’s senior quadruple sculls 12:39.8, 2 Belfast BC women sen quad 12:41.8, 3 RBAI junior single sculls (G McKillen) 13:03.1, 4 BBC/Portora masters double sculls 13:03.8, 5 BBC senior single (Wray) 13:05.9, 6 Lagan sen single (Darby) 13:06.3; 9 Portadown nov single (McKeown) 13:34.1; 15 Bann wom nov coxed quad 14:02.6.

Race Two: BBC/RBAI men sen quad 11:04.5, 2 Lagan Scullers’ men sen quad 11:46.9, 3 Methodist College jun 18A double sculls 12:38.9, 4 Lagan Scullers’ Masters single (Darby) 13:03.7, 5 RBAI jun 16 coxed quad 13:04.7, 6 Coleraine AI double sculls 13:08.1; 8 Portadown inter single (McKeown) 13:30.4; 9 Bann women’s sen double 13:36.0, 15 Bann women’s jun 16 coxed quad 14:16.7.

Race Three: 1 Methodist College jun 18A quad 11:53.8, 2 Coleraine AI jun 18B coxed quad 12:32.8, 3 Methody quad (time only) 12:42.1, 4 BBC/Lagan Scullers’ quad (mixed, time only) 12:54.5, 5 Methody women’s jun 18A quad 13:29.4, 6 Belfast BC women’s sen single (B Jacques) 13:49.6; 8 Bann women’s jun 16 double 14:13.8; 16 BBC women’s nov single (Turner) 14:50.5; 17 Portadown women’s jun 18A quad 14:57.6.

Published in Rowing

Ireland's Offshore Renewable Energy

Because of Ireland's location at the Atlantic edge of the EU, it has more offshore energy potential than most other countries in Europe. The conditions are suitable for the development of the full range of current offshore renewable energy technologies.

Offshore Renewable Energy FAQs

Offshore renewable energy draws on the natural energy provided by wind, wave and tide to convert it into electricity for industry and domestic consumption.

Offshore wind is the most advanced technology, using fixed wind turbines in coastal areas, while floating wind is a developing technology more suited to deeper water. In 2018, offshore wind provided a tiny fraction of global electricity supply, but it is set to expand strongly in the coming decades into a USD 1 trillion business, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA). It says that turbines are growing in size and in power capacity, which in turn is "delivering major performance and cost improvements for offshore wind farms".

The global offshore wind market grew nearly 30% per year between 2010 and 2018, according to the IEA, due to rapid technology improvements, It calculated that about 150 new offshore wind projects are in active development around the world. Europe in particular has fostered the technology's development, led by Britain, Germany and Denmark, but China added more capacity than any other country in 2018.

A report for the Irish Wind Energy Assocation (IWEA) by the Carbon Trust – a British government-backed limited company established to accelerate Britain's move to a low carbon economy - says there are currently 14 fixed-bottom wind energy projects, four floating wind projects and one project that has yet to choose a technology at some stage of development in Irish waters. Some of these projects are aiming to build before 2030 to contribute to the 5GW target set by the Irish government, and others are expected to build after 2030. These projects have to secure planning permission, obtain a grid connection and also be successful in a competitive auction in the Renewable Electricity Support Scheme (RESS).

The electricity generated by each turbine is collected by an offshore electricity substation located within the wind farm. Seabed cables connect the offshore substation to an onshore substation on the coast. These cables transport the electricity to land from where it will be used to power homes, farms and businesses around Ireland. The offshore developer works with EirGrid, which operates the national grid, to identify how best to do this and where exactly on the grid the project should connect.

The new Marine Planning and Development Management Bill will create a new streamlined system for planning permission for activity or infrastructure in Irish waters or on the seabed, including offshore wind farms. It is due to be published before the end of 2020 and enacted in 2021.

There are a number of companies aiming to develop offshore wind energy off the Irish coast and some of the larger ones would be ESB, SSE Renewables, Energia, Statkraft and RWE.

There are a number of companies aiming to develop offshore wind energy off the Irish coast and some of the larger ones would be ESB, SSE Renewables, Energia, Statkraft and RWE. Is there scope for community involvement in offshore wind? The IWEA says that from the early stages of a project, the wind farm developer "should be engaging with the local community to inform them about the project, answer their questions and listen to their concerns". It says this provides the community with "the opportunity to work with the developer to help shape the final layout and design of the project". Listening to fishing industry concerns, and how fishermen may be affected by survey works, construction and eventual operation of a project is "of particular concern to developers", the IWEA says. It says there will also be a community benefit fund put in place for each project. It says the final details of this will be addressed in the design of the RESS (see below) for offshore wind but it has the potential to be "tens of millions of euro over the 15 years of the RESS contract". The Government is also considering the possibility that communities will be enabled to invest in offshore wind farms though there is "no clarity yet on how this would work", the IWEA says.

Based on current plans, it would amount to around 12 GW of offshore wind energy. However, the IWEA points out that is unlikely that all of the projects planned will be completed. The industry says there is even more significant potential for floating offshore wind off Ireland's west coast and the Programme for Government contains a commitment to develop a long-term plan for at least 30 GW of floating offshore wind in our deeper waters.

There are many different models of turbines. The larger a turbine, the more efficient it is in producing electricity at a good price. In choosing a turbine model the developer will be conscious of this ,but also has to be aware the impact of the turbine on the environment, marine life, biodiversity and visual impact. As a broad rule an offshore wind turbine will have a tip-height of between 165m and 215m tall. However, turbine technology is evolving at a rapid rate with larger more efficient turbines anticipated on the market in the coming years.

 

The Renewable Electricity Support Scheme is designed to support the development of renewable energy projects in Ireland. Under the scheme wind farms and solar farms compete against each other in an auction with the projects which offer power at the lowest price awarded contracts. These contracts provide them with a guaranteed price for their power for 15 years. If they obtain a better price for their electricity on the wholesale market they must return the difference to the consumer.

Yes. The first auction for offshore renewable energy projects is expected to take place in late 2021.

Cost is one difference, and technology is another. Floating wind farm technology is relatively new, but allows use of deeper water. Ireland's 50-metre contour line is the limit for traditional bottom-fixed wind farms, and it is also very close to population centres, which makes visibility of large turbines an issue - hence the attraction of floating structures Do offshore wind farms pose a navigational hazard to shipping? Inshore fishermen do have valid concerns. One of the first steps in identifying a site as a potential location for an offshore wind farm is to identify and assess the level of existing marine activity in the area and this particularly includes shipping. The National Marine Planning Framework aims to create, for the first time, a plan to balance the various kinds of offshore activity with the protection of the Irish marine environment. This is expected to be published before the end of 2020, and will set out clearly where is suitable for offshore renewable energy development and where it is not - due, for example, to shipping movements and safe navigation.

YEnvironmental organisations are concerned about the impact of turbines on bird populations, particularly migrating birds. A Danish scientific study published in 2019 found evidence that larger birds were tending to avoid turbine blades, but said it didn't have sufficient evidence for smaller birds – and cautioned that the cumulative effect of farms could still have an impact on bird movements. A full environmental impact assessment has to be carried out before a developer can apply for planning permission to develop an offshore wind farm. This would include desk-based studies as well as extensive surveys of the population and movements of birds and marine mammals, as well as fish and seabed habitats. If a potential environmental impact is identified the developer must, as part of the planning application, show how the project will be designed in such a way as to avoid the impact or to mitigate against it.

A typical 500 MW offshore wind farm would require an operations and maintenance base which would be on the nearby coast. Such a project would generally create between 80-100 fulltime jobs, according to the IWEA. There would also be a substantial increase to in-direct employment and associated socio-economic benefit to the surrounding area where the operation and maintenance hub is located.

The recent Carbon Trust report for the IWEA, entitled Harnessing our potential, identified significant skills shortages for offshore wind in Ireland across the areas of engineering financial services and logistics. The IWEA says that as Ireland is a relatively new entrant to the offshore wind market, there are "opportunities to develop and implement strategies to address the skills shortages for delivering offshore wind and for Ireland to be a net exporter of human capital and skills to the highly competitive global offshore wind supply chain". Offshore wind requires a diverse workforce with jobs in both transferable (for example from the oil and gas sector) and specialist disciplines across apprenticeships and higher education. IWEA have a training network called the Green Tech Skillnet that facilitates training and networking opportunities in the renewable energy sector.

It is expected that developing the 3.5 GW of offshore wind energy identified in the Government's Climate Action Plan would create around 2,500 jobs in construction and development and around 700 permanent operations and maintenance jobs. The Programme for Government published in 2020 has an enhanced target of 5 GW of offshore wind which would create even more employment. The industry says that in the initial stages, the development of offshore wind energy would create employment in conducting environmental surveys, community engagement and development applications for planning. As a site moves to construction, people with backgrounds in various types of engineering, marine construction and marine transport would be recruited. Once the site is up and running , a project requires a team of turbine technicians, engineers and administrators to ensure the wind farm is fully and properly maintained, as well as crew for the crew transfer vessels transporting workers from shore to the turbines.

The IEA says that today's offshore wind market "doesn't even come close to tapping the full potential – with high-quality resources available in most major markets". It estimates that offshore wind has the potential to generate more than 420 000 Terawatt hours per year (TWh/yr) worldwide – as in more than 18 times the current global electricity demand. One Terawatt is 114 megawatts, and to put it in context, Scotland it has a population a little over 5 million and requires 25 TWh/yr of electrical energy.

Not as advanced as wind, with anchoring a big challenge – given that the most effective wave energy has to be in the most energetic locations, such as the Irish west coast. Britain, Ireland and Portugal are regarded as most advanced in developing wave energy technology. The prize is significant, the industry says, as there are forecasts that varying between 4000TWh/yr to 29500TWh/yr. Europe consumes around 3000TWh/year.

The industry has two main umbrella organisations – the Irish Wind Energy Association, which represents both onshore and offshore wind, and the Marine Renewables Industry Association, which focuses on all types of renewable in the marine environment.

©Afloat 2020