Menu

Ireland's sailing, boating & maritime magazine

Displaying items by tag: Belfast,

ROWING: Queen’s University led the way at the Lagan Head of the River in Belfast. Their men’s senior double was the fastest crew in the first head, and their senior eight matched the feat in the second. There was a slight headwind, and conditions were excellent. The organisers left 30 to 40 second gaps between the crews to avoid congestion at Queen Elizabeth bridge, which is undergoing repair work.

1195QUBBCMS 2XR.O'Connor10:57.3100.00
2109 MCBRCMJ18A 4-R Gilmore11:21.2103.64
3110 CAIBCMJ18A 4-J Kennedy11:52.1108.35
4101 MCBRCMJ18A 4X-R Gilmore12:04.2110.18
5131 QUBBCMI 1XJ Mitchell12:07.0110.61
6102 CAIBCMJ18A 4X-G Hunter12:12.5111.45
7125 QUBBCMN 4+S Leitch12:26.0113.50
8105 MCBRCMJ16 4X+S Graham12:27.4113.72
9119 Bann RC MJ18A 2XC Alcorn12:29.7114.06
10106 CAIBCMJ16 4X+S Archibald12:30.8114.23
11145 Commercial RC MM 4+ (D)R Keogh12:34.2114.74
12132 RBAIRCMI 1XC Beck12:41.7115.89
13137 Belfast BCMN 1XA Boreham12:43.5116.17
14117 Commercial RC MS 2-C Denny12:44.7116.35
15194De MaasMM 1X (B)R.Shirley12:47.9116.83
16133 MCBRCMJ18A 1XP Boomer12:49.5117.07
17108 Bann RC MJ18A 4-A Hamilton12:53.7117.72
18103 MCBRC BMJ18A 4X-R Gilmore12:55.1117.92
19124 Lagan Scullers ClubMS 1XN Darby12:57.9118.35
20134 Bann RCMJ18A 1XJ Casselles12:58.1118.38
21147 MCBRCWJ16 8+K McCurdy13:06.7119.69
22154 Belfast BC BMM 2X (F)H Coppinger13:07.5119.82
23128 RBAIRCMN 4+W MacGalliard13:11.2120.38
24116 Bann RC MJ15 4X+C Bell13:13.7120.76
25127 QUBBC (B)MN 4+R Crowley13:13.8120.78
26163 DULBC WN 4+N O'Sullivan13:15.9121.09
27146 Belfast BCMM 4+ (F)S Herron13:22.1122.04
28111 Blackrock CRC MJ16 4X+G Brassil13:25.5122.55
29104 Bann RC MJ16 4X+F Stinson13:25.7122.59
30120 MCBRCMJ18A 2XD Acheson13:28.4122.99
31186 MCBRC MJ15 2XK Redpath13:28.6123.03
32165 QUBLBCWN 4+C Moorehead13:29.2123.12
33153 MCBRCMJ18A 2-J Doyle13:30.0123.24
34114 CAIBCMJ15 4X+B Crawford13:30.8123.36
35172 QUBLBCWS 2-A Greene13:32.8123.66
36138 Belfast RCMI 1XJ Baird13:35.0124.00
37136 RBAIRCMJ18A 1XG McKillan13:35.6124.09
38167 Bann RC WJ18A 2XS Allen13:36.8124.27
39118 Commercial RC BMS 2-S Connnolly13:39.5124.69
40115 Belfast RC MN 4X+C.Driscoll13:39.7124.71
41156 Belfast RC MN 2XP Hewitt13:49.3126.17
42174 City of Derry BCMM 1X (D)G D'Urso13:51.8126.56
43149 Commercial RC WI 1 4+R Keogh13:52.3126.64
44183 Belfast BCWM 2X ( C)A Clayton13:52.9126.72
45157 Commercial RC WJ16 4X+A Keogh13:53.7126.84
46141 MCBRCMI 1XR Prodohl13:54.4126.94
47107 RBAIRCMJ16 4X+J McCauley13:59.0127.64
48140 CAIBCMI 1XM McMullan14:03.0128.25
49180 Lagan Scullers ClubMM 1X (D)J Phelan14:15.3130.13
50129 QUBBC ( C)MN 4+S Beer14:15.3130.14
51121 RBAIRCMJ18A 2XM Adair14:18.7130.64
52113 MCBRC BMJ15 8+M Wilson14:18.8130.67
53179 Belfast BCMM 1X (F)S Lockwood14:23.8131.43
54178 MCBRCWJ18A 1XJ English14:29.8132.33
55173 QUBLBC (B)WS 2-E Kerrigan14:31.2132.54
56135 Commercial RC MJ18A 1XM D'Estelle-Roe14:34.1132.99
57184 Belfast BCWM 2X (F)L Brown14:36.1133.29
58158 Bann RC WJ15 4X+L Ferguson14:37.4133.50
59155 QUBBCMN 2XP Mano14:42.5134.27
POSITIONCREW
NUMBERClubClassCox/SteererTime% of winning
time
60126 Belfast RC MN 4+A Doyle14:42.7134.29
61164 DULBC BWN 4+G Nic Fhionnain14:43.5134.42
62122 Portadown BC MJ18A 2XS McKeown14:44.0134.50
63187 Bann RC MJ15 2XC Boyle14:53.4135.92
64160 Commercial RC WN 4X+G Connolly14:54.0136.02
65150 Commercial RC BWI 1 4+K Keogh14:59.8136.90
66171 Lagan Scullers ClubMM 2X (E)J McAllister15:03.4137.45
67190 Commercial RC WN 1XG Foley15:10.3138.50
68170 Belfast BCMM 2X (F)S Bellamy15:12.1138.77
69185 Portadown BC MM 4X- (F)M Bell15:27.7141.14
70161 Belfast RC WJ16 4X+M McLaughlin15:33.5142.03
71159 Belfast RC WN 4X+A.Shirlow15:35.4142.32
72182 Portadown BC MM 1X ( C)J Finlay15:51.9144.82
73191 Lagan Scullers ClubWM 2X ( C)G McDaid15:58.4145.82
74188 Belfast RC WN 2XN Murray16:02.9146.50
75189 Belfast RCWN 1XL Cameron16:05.0146.82
76169 Belfast RC B WJ18A 2XS Flynn16:12.9148.02
77123 MCBRC BMJ18A 2XL Batchelor16:14.7148.30
78181 Portadown BC B MM 1X ( C)I McClements16:21.0149.25
79168 Belfast RCWJ18A 2XA. Herity16:23.2149.59
80144 Portadown BC MJ18A 1XI Divine16:25.0149.86
81193 Belfast BCWM 1X (E)A Forsythe17:54.1163.42
82142 QUBBCMN 1XC Logan18:32.9169.32
 112 MCBRCMJ15 8+B Gibson  
 130 CAIBCMS 1XS Archibald  
 139 RBAIRC (B)MI 1XA Lecky  
 143 RBAIRC (B)MJ18A 1XC Vallely-Gilroy  
 148 QUBLBCWI 1 4+Aiken  
 151 Commercial RC MJ18A 2-C O'Raida  
 152 CAIBCMJ18A 2-P McCullough  
 162 Commercial RC WN 4+G Connolly  
 166 CAIBCMJ16 2XP Campbell  
 175 DULBC WI 1 1XS Dolan  
 176 Belfast BCWJ18A 1X B Jacques  
 177 Belfast BC BWJ18A 1XL Litvack  
 192 Portadown BC WM 2X (B)J Kavanagh 
Published in Rowing

Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) - FAQS

Marine protected areas (MPAs) are geographically defined maritime areas where human activities are managed to protect important natural or cultural resources. In addition to conserving marine species and habitats, MPAs can support maritime economic activity and reduce the effects of climate change and ocean acidification.

MPAs can be found across a range of marine habitats, from the open ocean to coastal areas, intertidal zones, bays and estuaries. Marine protected areas are defined areas where human activities are managed to protect important natural or cultural resources.

The world's first MPA is said to have been the Fort Jefferson National Monument in Florida, North America, which covered 18,850 hectares of sea and 35 hectares of coastal land. This location was designated in 1935, but the main drive for MPAs came much later. The current global movement can be traced to the first World Congress on National Parks in 1962, and initiation in 1976 of a process to deliver exclusive rights to sovereign states over waters up to 200 nautical miles out then began to provide new focus

The Rio ‘Earth Summit’ on climate change in 1992 saw a global MPA area target of 10% by the 2010 deadline. When this was not met, an “Aichi target 11” was set requiring 10% coverage by 2020. There has been repeated efforts since then to tighten up MPA requirements.

Marae Moana is a multiple-use marine protected area created on July 13th 2017 by the government of the Cook islands in the south Pacific, north- east of New Zealand. The area extends across over 1.9 million square kilometres. However, In September 2019, Jacqueline Evans, a prominent marine biologist and Goldman environmental award winner who was openly critical of the government's plans for seabed mining, was replaced as director of the park by the Cook Islands prime minister’s office. The move attracted local media criticism, as Evans was responsible for developing the Marae Moana policy and the Marae Moana Act, She had worked on raising funding for the park, expanding policy and regulations and developing a plan that designates permitted areas for industrial activities.

Criteria for identifying and selecting MPAs depends on the overall objective or direction of the programme identified by the coastal state. For example, if the objective is to safeguard ecological habitats, the criteria will emphasise habitat diversity and the unique nature of the particular area.

Permanence of MPAs can vary internationally. Some are established under legislative action or under a different regulatory mechanism to exist permanently into the future. Others are intended to last only a few months or years.

Yes, Ireland has MPA cover in about 2.13 per cent of our waters. Although much of Ireland’s marine environment is regarded as in “generally good condition”, according to an expert group report for Government published in January 2021, it says that biodiversity loss and ecosystem degradation are of “wide concern due to increasing pressures such as overexploitation, habitat loss, pollution, and climate change”.

The Government has set a target of 30 per cent MPA coverage by 2030, and moves are already being made in that direction. However, environmentalists are dubious, pointing out that a previous target of ten per cent by 2020 was not met.

Conservation and sustainable management of the marine environment has been mandated by a number of international agreements and legal obligations, as an expert group report to government has pointed out. There are specific requirements for area-based protection in the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD), the OSPAR Convention, the UN Convention on Biological Diversity and the UN Sustainable Development Goals. 

Yes, the Marine Strategy Framework directive (2008/56/EC) required member states to put measures in place to achieve or maintain good environmental status in their waters by 2020. Under the directive a coherent and representative network of MPAs had to be created by 2016.

Ireland was about halfway up the EU table in designating protected areas under existing habitats and bird directives in a comparison published by the European Commission in 2009. However, the Fair Seas campaign, an environmental coalition formed in 2022, points out that Ireland is “lagging behind “ even our closest neighbours, such as Scotland which has 37 per cent. The Fair Seas campaign wants at least 10 per cent of Irish waters to be designated as “fully protected” by 2025, and “at least” 30 per cent by 2030.

Nearly a quarter of Britain’s territorial waters are covered by MPAs, set up to protect vital ecosystems and species. However, a conservation NGO, Oceana, said that analysis of fishing vessel tracking data published in The Guardian in October 2020 found that more than 97% of British MPAs created to safeguard ocean habitats, are being dredged and bottom trawled. 

There’s the rub. Currently, there is no definition of an MPA in Irish law, and environment protections under the Wildlife Acts only apply to the foreshore.

Current protection in marine areas beyond 12 nautical miles is limited to measures taken under the EU Birds and Habitats Directives or the OSPAR Convention. This means that habitats and species that are not listed in the EU Directives, but which may be locally, nationally or internationally important, cannot currently be afforded the necessary protection

Yes. In late March 2022, Minister for Housing Darragh O’Brien said that the Government had begun developing “stand-alone legislation” to enable identification, designation and management of MPAs to meet Ireland’s national and international commitments.

Yes. Environmental groups are not happy, as they have pointed out that legislation on marine planning took precedence over legislation on MPAs, due to the push to develop offshore renewable energy.

No, but some activities may be banned or restricted. Extraction is the main activity affected as in oil and gas activities; mining; dumping; and bottom trawling

The Government’s expert group report noted that MPA designations are likely to have the greatest influence on the “capture fisheries, marine tourism and aquaculture sectors”. It said research suggests that the net impacts on fisheries could ultimately be either positive or negative and will depend on the type of fishery involved and a wide array of other factors.

The same report noted that marine tourism and recreation sector can substantially benefit from MPA designation. However, it said that the “magnitude of the benefits” will depend to a large extent on the location of the MPA sites within the network and the management measures put in place.

© Afloat 2022