The Port of Galway has secured consent to provide compensatory habitat in return for its proposed harbour extension.
An Bord Pleanala has confirmed that the development qualifies to be considered under a derogation of the EU Habitats Directive, which allows projects to be built for "Imperative Reasons of Overriding Public Interest". (IROPI).
The port, which is restricted by tide, applied in 2014 for a €126m expansion.
This would involve the reclamation of 24 hectares from the sea bed and extensive development of deepwater berth space.
Bord Pleanála said that certain elements of the proposed development would have a significant adverse impact on Galway bay, with permanent loss of reef, mud and sand habitats in a candidate special area of conservation.
In its submission, the port has offered compensatory habitat which it would restore.
An Bord Pleanála says it approved the IROPI case for several reasons:
It says it “concluded that the proposal presents an integrated development that enhances the social, economic and recreational benefits of the port for the wider benefit of the population of Galway and its regional hinterland”.
“The enhancement of port facilities also aligns with the European transportation policy promoting ‘short-sea shipping’ as a cost-effective and environmentally sustainable alternative to road transport,” it says.
“The enhancement of the port serving the region will therefore align with European, national and regional policies in favour of balanced spatial and economic development,” it says.
“The port and the tradition of maritime trade is fundamental not just to the economy of Galway but also to its culture and identity,” it says.
“The social and economic benefits of the project include positive impacts to tourism, marine research and development, including offshore renewable energy, urban regeneration and marine leisure opportunities,” it says.
Port of Galway chief executive officer Conor O’Dowd welcomed the confirmation as a “positive further step in the planning process”.
An Bord Pleanála says it has asked the Minister of Housing, Local Government and Heritage to “consider the adequacy of the compensatory measures proposed by the applicant”.
It has also asked the minister to “advise as to whether there are imperative reasons of overriding public interest to enable consideration of the proposed development to proceed”.